Ministry News

Tithing Declines With Economy

A new Barna Group study reveals how the economic duress of recent years as affected Americans' charitable giving.

In the study, released May 10, 77 percent attested to being personally touched by the nation’s financial difficulties. About one-quarter (28 percent) indicated they have been affected in a “major way.”

Following the economic crisis of late 2008, 20 percent of Americans reduced their giving to churches and religious organizations, and 31 percent downsized giving to other nonprofits. Fourteen months later saw a slight improvement in giving trends, but the latest research from Barna, conducted in April 2011, indicates that the numbers of reticent church givers are still hovering at 30 percent. While for the last decade, between 5 and 7 percent of Americans tithed, this number has dropped to 4 percent of the adult population in 2011—significantly lower than last year’s rate  of 7 percent.

“The economic downturn influenced donations later than it affected other aspects of our spending,” noted David Kinnaman, president of the Barna Group. “Once it kicked in, though, donors have cut back significantly in their giving to churches and nonprofits. Now, even as the economy shows some signs of improvement, donors are still reluctant to return to their previous levels of generosity. They may be less shell-shocked than 15 months ago, but they are still cautious."

Kinnaman suggested that, rather than attempting to get their financially struggling members to increase their giving, churches and nonprofits with the most effective response to the downturn are those that have "reduced their operating costs without undermining their impact, enabling them to remain effective with less revenue." A diminished capacity for programming and building campaigns has led churches to instead invest in relationships and be creative in serving one another in the midst of financial stress.

— The Barna Group

Comments   

 
0 #22 B.J.Stone 2011-05-25 01:40
#21 Many today simply dismiss differences, dialog as knee jerk reactions of bitterness. This does not line up with purposes of meeting together in fellowships 'even as we see the day(only Father knows) approaching'. Fellowship purposes increases toward 'exhortations', EXHORTING one another as we rapidly approach that 'next life' elsewhere as Jesus taught. All will be resurrected, some to damnation, some to eternal life, most simply that better dust body of longivity, all still facing 'second death'. All down here in this dirty now & now on this cursed planet in 'sinful flesh bodies' are unrighteous (Romans) including leaders. We MUST meet to exhort ALL, ALL THE MORE. It's in this honesty of evaluations of who we are while awaiting 'next life' that fellowships are to function without nicoliatanisms dominating IN WHICH HOLY SPIRIT STILL KNOCKS ON CHURCH DOORS, INVITING INDIVIDUALS TO SUP WITH HIM INDIVIDUALLY, NOT BY GROUP DEMANDS.
Quote
 
 
0 #21 Michael Hicks 2011-05-24 20:13
Do we assume that a church institution, by definition, cannot be a relational body of believers? Although I agree that this certainly can be the case, it does not have to be nor should it be when healthy. Just because a group of believers have a facility to meet in, and they maintain and financially support an elder to shephard the flock with all of its leadership and oversight responsibilities, does not make this same body devoid of the Spirit, does it? Or as earlier stated; just because we recieve tithes to support the different needs and responsibilities of the body does it mean that a Nicholatian style of superiority is by necessity the form of leadership present. When did we adopt such contempt for shephards and elders? I don't find this in Paul's writings to Timothy, nor anywhere else in the scriptures that readily comes to mind. As a shepherd it saddens me to hear so much bitterness in the body... not from all of course, but enough to sadden me.
Quote
 
 
+3 #20 JohnS 2011-05-24 18:24
The issue we face is not a decline in giving; but a turning away from Christ, and therefore the absence of worship. I disagree with many on tithing applied today, but God loves and honors a cheerful giver.

I think it is really difficult to give a large sum of your income to "institutions" rather than a relational body of believers you are committed to. We have become too distant from God, and as a consequence from one another. We have neither the desire or tolerance for fellowship in the Spirit, because it requires something of us we are unwilling to bear. At it's most fundamental level, we refuse to be identified with God's will because we have preferred our own. A man cannot serve two masters indeed.

May we find grace to endure the suffering and patience required to bear his likeness in the unity of the Spirit in Christ. Then we will bear one anothers' burden's with joy knowing he is able to make all grace abound.

.
Quote
 
 
0 #19 Michael Hicks 2011-05-19 04:22
This article states that on average only 4% tithe. So where goes the function of the church? Where does the stranger, the widow, the orphan go for help? An individual who has money? Or what has actually happened,.. a government welfare system that enslaves? Jesus does say to the leaders in reference to tithing that they should not have neglected the light nor the heavy things of the tithe, nowhere does He say the tithe is obsolete or has passed away or ceased. Isn't this the same arguement some use for the sessation of the manifestation of the Holy Spirit.
I am only saying, how much of our stance on this is cultural sensitivity? God haters and church haters angry at the church, the easy target... their money? The Scripture tells us to exhort, correct, and rebuke (2 TIm) yet it is more Exhort, exhort, exhort else the church will leave. Why should they stay when they can go anywhere else and be free not to change. The teaching of the end of tithe is inferred, not scriptural.
Quote
 
 
0 #18 B.J.Stone 2011-05-19 03:07
#17 If the church is 'tax exempt' (501C3) operating under the laws of society of these last of last days for this planet, regardless of it's location, but especially in No. America IT IS A BUSINESS. Businesses today do not survive if run on 'coin in the fishes mouth' ONLY fiscal policies. However, if it remains small (more like an immediate family trust) with no city or town evangelistic efforts visioned future, it may stay together in these very last of the last days for this globe before these 'heavens BEING on fire'. ALSO APPRECIATE #15 COMMENTS (by 'JOHNboy' previously)
Quote
 
 
+1 #17 laurence jones 2011-05-19 01:48
God doesn't want 10% of our money...He wants 100% of our hearts and generosity. The NT speaks of giving in numerous places. Giving not under compulsion (Law) but giving out of a thankful and compassionate heart..
Excellent summation. This is the basis of our teaching on giving at the church I founded. We even went one step further by not taking up an offering during services. People are encouraged to simply bring their offering [gifts] to one of the two baskets that are available. Those who do do so before the service even starts.
Quote
 
 
+1 #16 Femi Mafe 2011-05-18 20:32
johnboy: I love your comments Brother. You are right on point. My take is just that if there were no such guidelines, most people would rather give nothing. Shouldn't we just accommodate the tithing policy just because of this?
Quote
 
 
+1 #15 johnboy 2011-05-18 17:26
The NT speaks nothing of a Christian tithe (10%), Certainly where Christ encourages the pharisee to continue tithing (Matt 23:23) he was speaking to one who was under The Law. In the Acts 15:20 directive to Christians, no tithe is found. Neither is the "collection" of 1 Cor 16:1 a tithe. If the writer of Hebrews wanted to issue a directive to tithe in Heb 7:4 he didn't. Why? Because we are no longer bound by The Law (Gal 3) and secondly God doesn't want our money, Pastors do, so they can pay their mortages. Why do we give the tithe to them anyway? The tithe went to the Levites (Num 18:21). In fact those that would put themselves under Law should be obedient to all of it (James 2:10) - there were 3 tithes. Two yearly ones and one every three years.
God doesn't want 10% of our money...He wants 100% of our hearts and generosity. The NT speaks of giving in numerous places. Giving not under compulsion (Law) but giving out of a thankful and compassionate heart..
Quote
 
 
0 #14 Kae 2011-05-18 14:41
I actually never tithed until now. I grew up in the church and my parents were great givers, etc. I never really saw the point, I was a student, paying bills, my rent, working minimum wage. Now I'm graduated, and work two separate jobs. It wasn't until my pastor said, if your excuse is: "I don't have enough money ... you never will." I've been giving ever since.
Quote
 
 
0 #13 B.J.Stone 2011-05-18 04:12
As to definition of 'nicolaitanism' simply Greek street meaning of NT Bible days="ruling over the laity". ONLY THE HOLY SPIRIT HERE TODAY SITTING ON THE THRONE OF HIS GRACE HAS GOD ORDAINED AUTHORITY TO RULE OF CHURCHES,ESPECIALLY THE LAITY. Our NT invites us to come "boldly" to this "throne of His grace" to find "help" in our "time of need". The entire 'catholic system' (including the "reformed" catholic permeating our society today) is based entirely upon paganism AND rivalry with the Holy Spirit of Promise as to 'who conguers over who' ESPECIALLY AS IT APPLIES TO CHURCH LAITY. We are told FIRST to completely "come out" from "among them" and be "separate" (SEPARATED ENTIRELY) especially as a pentecostal church. As to anti-anointing, anti-christ churches, they ALL are 'nicolaitan' and simply need to 'watch out' as to 'beating of other fellow servants' AND guard against becoming 'gates' of HELL!
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

CHANNELS:
Visit Charisma magazineVisit SpiritLed WomanVisit Ministry Today magazineVisit Vida Cristiana
advertisement
Download the Vacation Bible School 2012 guide
advertisement

Subscribe to our Magazine

Ministry Today Digital

Ministry Clip of the Week

Download Video: HTML5 Video Player by VideoJS

a